2
complaints as it came in, and in each case, Nationwide had provided either information that satisfied
the Department’s initial concerns or paid the claim in a timely manner after the complaint was
forwarded to Nationwide. As such, each complaint was closed at the time without an in-depth
investigation.
4. However, while conducting routine market conduct analysis in 2021, the
Department’s market conduct team reviewed the claims together and identified similarities between
the four complaints that were not obvious in reviewing any particular complaint. Each complaint
included a lengthy medical review process by Nationwide during its claim handling process. And
each complaint response from the company included letters identifying that more time was
necessary to investigate each claim, but those letters were imprecise as to why additional time was
needed. When those similarities were identified, the Department decided to investigate further,
leading to this agreement.
Slow Claims Handling Time
5. Each of the four complaints at its core was a complaint that Nationwide was taking
or took too long to process their pet insurance claim. In most of the complaints, there was a need
for the consumer, or their veterinarian, to submit medical information for Nationwide to review.
And while that might have caused additional time, the primary cause of the delays was caused by
Nationwide and its review of the medical history of the covered dogs.
6. Each of the four complaints was tied to an unreasonably long claim processing time.
Each of their claims lasted longer than a reasonable consumer, and the Department, would expect an
insurance claim should last. Specifically, the four consumers who complained had claims that took
52, 100, 106, and 133 calendar days to close. More specifically, from reviewing the Company’s
claim files, the Department calculated the following days between when Nationwide received the
medical records and the closure of the claim: 42, 71, 81, and 71 calendar days, respectively.